netdev - Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4649F11F.3040807@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2007 10:42:55 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ?
> 
> I see that there is no check to prevent this or return
> success early, without doing any work. Do we need one ?
> 
> slub code is complaining that we are doing kmalloc(0).
> 

select(0, ...) is valid, and is functionally equivalent to
select(..., NULL, NULL, NULL, ...); except that any nonzero fdsets get
zeroed on return.  As such, the only thing that can interrupt it is the
timeout, or a signal.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html