netdev - Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179363553.16195.10.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2007 17:59:12 -0700
From:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
To:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 10:37 -0500, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
> 
> > It's interesting that compat_core_sys_select() shows this kmalloc(0)
> > failure but core_sys_select() does not.  That's because core_sys_select()
> > avoids kmalloc by using a buffer on the stack for small allocations (and
> > 0 sure is small).  Shouldn't compat_core_sys_select() do just the same?
> > Or is SLUB going to be so efficient that doing so is a waste of time?
> 
> Nice catch, the original optimisation from Andi is:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/git-new/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=70674f95c0a2ea694d5c39f4e514f538a09be36f
> 
> And I think it makes sense for the compat code to do it too.
> 
> Anton

Here it is ..

Should I do one for poll() also ?

Thanks,
Badari

Optimize select by a using stack space for small fd sets.
core_sys_select() already has this optimization. This is
for compat version. 

Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
---
 fs/compat.c |   17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22-rc1/fs/compat.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc1.orig/fs/compat.c	2007-05-12 18:45:56.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/fs/compat.c	2007-05-16 17:50:39.000000000 -0700
@@ -1544,9 +1544,10 @@ int compat_core_sys_select(int n, compat
 	compat_ulong_t __user *outp, compat_ulong_t __user *exp, s64 *timeout)
 {
 	fd_set_bits fds;
-	char *bits;
+	void *bits;
 	int size, max_fds, ret = -EINVAL;
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
+	long stack_fds[SELECT_STACK_ALLOC/sizeof(long)];
 
 	if (n < 0)
 		goto out_nofds;
@@ -1564,11 +1565,14 @@ int compat_core_sys_select(int n, compat
 	 * since we used fdset we need to allocate memory in units of
 	 * long-words.
 	 */
-	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	size = FDS_BYTES(n);
-	bits = kmalloc(6 * size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!bits)
-		goto out_nofds;
+	bits = stack_fds;
+	if (size > sizeof(stack_fds) / 6) {
+		bits = kmalloc(6 * size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		if (!bits)
+			goto out_nofds;
+	}
 	fds.in      = (unsigned long *)  bits;
 	fds.out     = (unsigned long *) (bits +   size);
 	fds.ex      = (unsigned long *) (bits + 2*size);
@@ -1600,7 +1604,8 @@ int compat_core_sys_select(int n, compat
 	    compat_set_fd_set(n, exp, fds.res_ex))
 		ret = -EFAULT;
 out:
-	kfree(bits);
+	if (bits != stack_fds)
+		kfree(bits);
 out_nofds:
 	return ret;
 }



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html