netdev - Re: [RFC] netdevice ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <464D2A34.5000303@candelatech.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2007 21:23:16 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] netdevice ops

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I want to take all the function pointers of 'struct net_device' and
> move them to 'struct net_device_ops'. This will save memory for the
> case of lots of devices, as well as reduce initialization code.
>
> Rough plan:
> 1. Introduce inline accessors so protocols don't dereference dev->XXX directly.
> 2. Fix protocols to use #1
> 3. Add ops field to net_device, and netdevice_register will fill in old values
>    in 'struct net_device'.
> 4...1300 Fix all network devices to use ops field
> 1301 Change accessors to use ops, get rid of old 'struct net_device' function pointers.
>
> It isn't rocket science just another code exercise. I'll patch bomb it into something
> like 2.6.23-mm first.
>
> This should really help the people who like to do 1000's of vlans etc.
>   
Vlan code uses several of the methods, so I'm not sure how it will save 
any memory unless
you will somehow have a variable sized net_device_ops structure, or 
maybe only move a
certain subset of methods into the ops struct?

Also, this will be a new chunk of memory to keep in cache and 
allocate/deallocate..wouldn't it be more efficient to
keep it local to the netdevice struct?

And there is an extra cost to dereference the point to the ops before 
calling methods?

Thanks,
Ben
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>   


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html