[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070517.220529.115910791.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jgarzik@...ox.com
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] netdevice ops
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:54:13 -0400
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I want to take all the function pointers of 'struct net_device' and
> > move them to 'struct net_device_ops'. This will save memory for the
> > case of lots of devices, as well as reduce initialization code.
>
> It will also add an additional deref to every operation, right?
Yes, it's certainly going to. How much do we think that actually
matters?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists