[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070518231830.9202A6F0C1@alopias.GreenKey.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Curtis Doty <Curtis@...enKey.net>
To: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: e1000: assertion hit in e1000_clean(), kernel 2.6.21.1
4:03pm Kok, Auke said:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> We have several reports now of hitting this assertion in
>> netif_rx_complete(), inlined in e1000_clean():
>>
>> BUG_ON(!test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &dev->state));
>>
>> [<c0431162>] __queue_work+0x51/0x5e
>> [<c059eea1>] et_rx_action+0x94/0x185
>> [<c042837d>] __do_softirq+0x5d/0xba
>> [<c0407837>] do_softirq+0x59/0xb1
>> [<c04281e9>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x35/0x40
>> [<c059e46b>] dev_open+0x44/0x62
>> [<c059ce8c>] dev_change_flags+0x46/0xe3
>> [<c05d9e09>] devinet_ioctl+0x250/0x56a
>>
>> The second function is "net_rx_action", corrupted
>> by the serial connection.
>> The source file has four extra lines at the top because of a
>> trivial wireless patch, so 898 in that code is really 894 in
>> the stock kernel.
>
> please shared that code then.
>
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel/linux-2.6-wireless.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists