[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-2.6] [TCP] FRTO: Add missing ECN CWR sending
to one of the responses
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:15:21 +0300 (EEST)
> The conservative spurious RTO response did not queue CWR even
> though the sending rate was lowered. Whenever reduction happens
> regardless of reason, CWR should be sent (forgetting to send it
> is not very fatal though).
>
> A better approach would be to queue CWR when one of the sending
> rate reducing responses (rate-halving one or this conservative
> response) is used already at RTO. Doing that would allow CWR to
> be sent along with the two new data segments that are sent
> during FRTO. However, it's a bit "racy" because userland could
> tune the response sysctl to a more aggressive one in between.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Applied, thanks Ilpo.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists