netdev - Re: [PATCH] libertas: skb dereferenced after netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179622601.9453.4.camel@xo-28-0B-88.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 19 May 2007 20:56:41 -0400
From:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc:	Florin Malita <fmalita@...il.com>, marcelo@...ck.org,
	linville@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: skb dereferenced after netif_rx

On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 14:09 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:01:27PM -0400, Florin Malita wrote:
> > In libertas_process_rxed_packet() and process_rxed_802_11_packet() the 
> > skb is dereferenced after being passed to netif_rx (called from 
> > libertas_upload_rx_packet). Spotted by Coverity (1658, 1659).
>  
> Relocating the libertas_upload_rx_packet call is fine, but...
> 
> > Also, libertas_upload_rx_packet() unconditionally returns 0 so the error 
> > check is dead code - might as well take it out.
> 
> Is this merely an implementation detail?  Or an absolute fact?
> If the former is true, then we should preserve the error
> checking.  If the latter, then we should change the signature of
> libertas_upload_rx_packet to return void.

According to the comments, netif_rx always succeeds.  I think we should
just change the return type to void since there's nothing else in that
function that can fail.

Dan


> > Signed-off-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@...il.com>
> 
> > 	lbs_pr_debug(1, "RX Data: size of actual packet = %d\n", skb->len);
> > -	if (libertas_upload_rx_packet(priv, skb)) {
> > -		lbs_pr_debug(1, "RX error: libertas_upload_rx_packet"
> > -		       " returns failure\n");
> > -		ret = -1;
> > -		goto done;
> > -	}
> > 	priv->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
> > 	priv->stats.rx_packets++;
> > 
> > +	libertas_upload_rx_packet(priv, skb);
> > +
> > 	ret = 0;
> > done:
> > 	LEAVE();
> 
> Another potential patch is to remove the "ret = 0" line before the
> "done" label, since ret is initialized at the head of the function.
> Come to think of it, you can probably remove the "= 0" part of ret's
> declaration as well (in both functions).
> 
> Hth!
> 
> John
> 
> P.S.  Also, please make sure to send wireless patches to
> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org and CC me.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html