lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 13:44:28 +0100
From:	Kieran Mansley <>
To:	Keir Fraser <>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <>,,,,
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/4] [Net] Support Xen accelerated
	network plugin modules

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 08:48 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 22/5/07 08:28, "Kieran Mansley" <> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 08:15 +0100, Kieran Mansley wrote:
> >> RCU on its own wouldn't
> >> prevent the accelerated plugin being unloaded while netfront was using
> >> one of the hooks.
> > 
> > Hmm, actually I think it could be used to do that.  I'll take a look.
> Eagerly zap the function pointers, then wait one RCU period so every CPU
> goes through a quiescent point before unloading the module?
>  -- Keir

Am I right in thinking that if one of the functions that was protected
by RCU was to block, that would be a bad thing?  Clearly the data path
hooks can't/don't block, but I'm not sure it's so obvious for things
like probing a new device. 


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists