[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180013913.4092.7.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:38:33 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter P <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>, xma@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] [NET_SCHED]make qdisc_restart more readable
On Thu, 2007-24-05 at 05:41 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> > + if (unlikely (ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY && net_ratelimit()))
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " BUG %s code %d qlen %d\n",dev->name, ret, q->q.qlen);
>
>
> This seems to be based on an old version, your latest patch
> changed this to KERN_WARNING.
sigh.
I wont be able to do this change until tonight or tommorow morning. I
think the process i am using to re-generate patches maybe too consuming?
Maybe you could offer some advice. Heres what i do:
1. clone Daves latest tree localy
2. clone another tree from that
3. create patch on second clone
4. compile; test;compile;test until looks reasonable
5. commit with the comments
6. submit
7. build other patches on top (example batching in this case)
8. feedback on patch comes back
9. Re-do steps #2-#6
My steps #2-#6 are expensive; is there a way to optimize that process?
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists