[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46562AA2.8030102@mvista.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:15:30 -0700
From: Mark Huth <mhuth@...sta.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][af_key]pfkey_add: Optimize SA adds and algorithm probes
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:34:12PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Actually, I think we should just probe for the specific algorithm
>> requested rather than everything. See patch below.
>
> Doh, forgot to actually remove the probe call :)
>
> [IPSEC] pfkey: Load specific algorithm in pfkey_add rather than all
>
> This is a natural extension of the changeset
>
> [XFRM]: Probe selected algorithm only.
>
> which only removed the probe call for xfrm_user. This patch does exactly
> the same thing for af_key. In other words, we load the algorithm requested
> by the user rather than everything when adding xfrm states in af_key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>
> Cheers,
[... snip]
Herbert,
I can verify that this works. The test adds 2000 instances of SAs using
hmac-md5 for authentication and rijndael-cbc for encryption.
Test output is:
root@....168.150.94:~# lsmod
Module Size Used by
root@....168.150.94:~#time setkey -f SA_test.txt
real 0m1.072s
user 0m0.048s
sys 0m0.632s
root@....168.150.94:~#lsmod
Module Size Used by
twofish 10112 0
twofish_common 40192 1 twofish
camellia 32768 0
serpent 25216 0
blowfish 9984 0
ecb 3712 0
aes 28864 2000
xcbc 5768 0
sha256 12416 0
crypto_null 3456 0
root@....168.150.94:~#
Prior to the patch time was over 42 seconds (possibly longer on 2.6.21).
I'm a bit curious why all of the crypto modules got loaded, but it
doesn't matter.
Thanks for the patch.
Mark Huth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists