[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070527.021104.74747736.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 02:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9]: tcp-2.6 patchset
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:58:27 +0300 (EEST)
> On Sat, 26 May 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> > Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:35:53 +0300
> >
> > > Dave, you could consider applying other than the last one if they
> > > seem ok to you too (you'll need to rebase your tcp-2.6 in that case
> > > first to apply cleanly those that touch tcp_sync_left_out :-)).
> >
> > Absolutely, I'll do the quick rebase of tcp-2.6 and review +
> > applying of your patches (except the last one) over the weekend.
>
> While you're in the right context (reviewing patch 8), you could also
> look if tcp_clean_rtx_queue does a right thing when passing a strange
> pkts_acked to congestion control modules. I wonder if it really should
> ignore GSO the way it does currently... I read some cc module code and
> some was adding it to snd_cwnd_cnt, etc. which is a strong indication
> that GSO should be considered... Also if the head is GSO skb that is not
> completely acked, the loop breaks with pkts_acked being zero, I doubt
> that can be correct...
I rebased tcp-2.6, applied your patches 1-7 (which I'll comment
a bit on tomorrow) and will likely take a look at these issues
wrt. patch 8 tomorrow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists