netdev - Re: [PATCH] b44: netpoll locking fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070529142734.3de0ef4f@freepuppy>
Date:	Tue, 29 May 2007 14:27:34 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44: netpoll locking fix

On Tue, 29 May 2007 23:14:58 +0200
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:

> The irq handling thread (b44_interrupt) uses the same lock as the NAPI
> thread. This change should prevent a deadlock if something interrupts
> the b44 NAPI thread and tries to printk through netconsole.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>


Better to just get rid of using the lock as a transmit lock and
use netif_tx_lock instead.
--- a/drivers/net/b44.c	2007-05-29 09:51:43.000000000 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c	2007-05-29 14:26:03.000000000 -0700
@@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ static void b44_tx(struct b44 *bp)
 {
 	u32 cur, cons;
 
+	netif_tx_lock(bp->dev);
 	cur  = br32(bp, B44_DMATX_STAT) & DMATX_STAT_CDMASK;
 	cur /= sizeof(struct dma_desc);
 
@@ -622,7 +623,7 @@ static void b44_tx(struct b44 *bp)
 				 skb->len,
 				 PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
 		rp->skb = NULL;
-		dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
+		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
 	}
 
 	bp->tx_cons = cons;
@@ -631,6 +632,7 @@ static void b44_tx(struct b44 *bp)
 		netif_wake_queue(bp->dev);
 
 	bw32(bp, B44_GPTIMER, 0);
+	netif_tx_unlock(bp->dev);
 }
 
 /* Works like this.  This chip writes a 'struct rx_header" 30 bytes
@@ -855,14 +857,8 @@ static int b44_poll(struct net_device *n
 	struct b44 *bp = netdev_priv(netdev);
 	int done;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&bp->lock);
-
-	if (bp->istat & (ISTAT_TX | ISTAT_TO)) {
-		/* spin_lock(&bp->tx_lock); */
+	if (bp->istat & (ISTAT_TX | ISTAT_TO))
 		b44_tx(bp);
-		/* spin_unlock(&bp->tx_lock); */
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&bp->lock);
 
 	done = 1;
 	if (bp->istat & ISTAT_RX) {
@@ -970,21 +966,19 @@ static int b44_start_xmit(struct sk_buff
 {
 	struct b44 *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct sk_buff *bounce_skb;
-	int rc = NETDEV_TX_OK;
 	dma_addr_t mapping;
 	u32 len, entry, ctrl;
 
-	len = skb->len;
-	spin_lock_irq(&bp->lock);
-
-	/* This is a hard error, log it. */
 	if (unlikely(TX_BUFFS_AVAIL(bp) < 1)) {
-		netif_stop_queue(dev);
-		printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: BUG! Tx Ring full when queue awake!\n",
-		       dev->name);
-		goto err_out;
+		if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev)) {
+			netif_stop_queue(dev);
+			printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: BUG! Tx Ring full when queue awake!\n",
+			       dev->name);
+		}
+		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
 	}
 
+	len = skb->len;
 	mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data, len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
 	if (dma_mapping_error(mapping) || mapping + len > DMA_30BIT_MASK) {
 		/* Chip can't handle DMA to/from >1GB, use bounce buffer */
@@ -1044,16 +1038,14 @@ static int b44_start_xmit(struct sk_buff
 	if (TX_BUFFS_AVAIL(bp) < 1)
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
 
-	dev->trans_start = jiffies;
-
-out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&bp->lock);
+	mmiowb();
 
-	return rc;
+	dev->trans_start = jiffies;
 
+	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 err_out:
-	rc = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
-	goto out_unlock;
+	dev_kfree_skb(skb);
+	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 }
 
 static int b44_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html