lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 11:38:28 +0200
From:	KOVACS Krisztian <>
To:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers are removed


On Friday 18 May 2007 11:05, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julian Anastasov <>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:40:54 +0300 (EEST)
> > On Thu, 17 May 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > In any case some better solution than the current one needs to be
> > > found, allowing users to send spoofed packets is far worse than
> > > using a non-desired source address for ICMP packets.
> >
> > 	yes, I would prefer the sysctl_ip_nonlocal_bind change to be
> > removed until such solution is found.
> Ok, I'll revert it.

  I'm just about to publish the next round of tproxy patches (with the 
routing code modifications completely removed), but this issue is still 

  I've posted a few patches making omitting this check possible 
selectively back in March. Do those changes look acceptable?

  And the related socket layer changes:

  Krisztian Kovacs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists