netdev - Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/02]: Flexible SFQ flow classification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <465DAC73.6070507@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 18:55:15 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/02]: Flexible SFQ flow classification

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-30-05 at 18:23 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>My classifier seperates them entirely. The only thing it keeps
>>in SFQ is the old classifier for compatibility, besides that its
>>exactly what you say. It should be easily possible to remove it
>>entirely and use my classifier in a compatible configuration
>>automatically.
>>
> 
> 
> If you removed it entirely (and had it as a separate classifier) IMO
> that would be a better approach. Then what you have is a pure FQ qdisc.
> In which case, you leave alone SFQ and have a new qdisc.

I could do that, but I'm perfectly happy with the qdisc part of SFQ.
Without the classifier SFQ is of course simply a FQ qdisc, all it
cares about is serving queues equally.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html