lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:43:47 +0200 From: Emmanuel Fusté <emmanuel.fuste@...oste.net> To: "romieu" <romieu@...zoreil.com> Cc: "tsbogend" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "lsorense" <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>, "pcnet32" <pcnet32@...izon.net>, "netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PCNET32] Lock solid with netconsole > Even if the driver-agnostic part of the irq processing can be interrupted > locally, the irq handlers are run sequentially on a given cpu. It does not > leave a lot of room for a deadlock-prone printk(). > > It _can_ happen but I'd prefer to pinpoint a specific candidate path > where it would have happened. > Hi, Could this bug fix from Stephen Hemminger be another track to follow ? http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=118048588011069&w=2 If you think so, I could give it a try whitout applying the "spin_lock_irqsave" patch. --- Créez votre adresse électronique prenom.nom@...oste.net 1 Go d'espace de stockage, anti-spam et anti-virus intégrés. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists