netdev - Re: [PCNET32] Lock solid with netconsole

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <JIUG4Z$FE429A5F18B9052E8E0CF6906B6CB68A@laposte.net>
Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 09:43:47 +0200
From:	Emmanuel Fusté <emmanuel.fuste@...oste.net>
To:	"romieu" <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	"tsbogend" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	"lsorense" <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	"pcnet32" <pcnet32@...izon.net>, "netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PCNET32] Lock solid with netconsole

> Even if the driver-agnostic part of the irq processing can be interrupted
> locally, the irq handlers are run sequentially on a given cpu. It does not
> leave a lot of room for a deadlock-prone printk().
> 
> It _can_ happen but I'd prefer to pinpoint a specific candidate path
> where it would have happened.
> 
Hi,

Could this bug fix from Stephen Hemminger be another track to follow ?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=118048588011069&w=2
If you think so, I could give it a try whitout applying the "spin_lock_irqsave" patch.


---

Créez votre adresse électronique prenom.nom@...oste.net 
1 Go d'espace de stockage, anti-spam et anti-virus intégrés.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html