[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180624569.23536.7.camel@athlon>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:16:09 -0400
From: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, doug.chapman@...com
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: panic on e1000 driver
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:08 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> >
> > but once again broken just yesterday by the following commit. I have
> > backed just this commit out and verified I no longer panic.
>
> Hmm, the only way I can see this happening is if the hardware signals
> an interrupt even though we've explicitly shut it off. Does this patch
> help? If it does help, does it produce the warning in dmesg?
>
> Thanks,
The patch does fix the panic. Here are all the e1000 messages from
dmesg after a bootup. Note that only eth0 is actually configured and
connected:
# dmesg | grep e1000
e1000: 0000:01:02.0: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:66MHz:64-bit) 00:15:60:04:d7:f8
e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
e1000: 0000:01:02.1: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:66MHz:64-bit) 00:15:60:04:d7:f9
e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
e1000: 0000:15:02.0: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:66MHz:64-bit) 00:12:79:9e:b7:c4
e1000: eth2: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
e1000: 0000:15:02.1: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:66MHz:64-bit) 00:12:79:9e:b7:c5
e1000: eth3: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
e1000: Unexpected interrupt icr=0x4
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
Control: RX
- Doug
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists