[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070531093703.373995b2@freepuppy>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:37:03 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Klein <osstklei@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
"Jan-Bernd Themann" <ossthema@...ibm.com>,
"Jan-Bernd Themann" <themann@...ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ppc" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <ossrosch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ehea: Receive SKB Aggregation
>
>
> +static int try_get_ip_tcp_hdr(struct ehea_cqe *cqe, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct iphdr **iph, struct tcphdr **tcph)
> +{
> + int ip_len;
> +
> + /* non tcp/udp packets */
> + if (!cqe->header_length)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* non tcp packet */
> + *iph = (struct iphdr *)(skb->data);
Why the indirection, copying of headers..
> + if ((*iph)->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ip_len = (u8)((*iph)->ihl);
> + ip_len <<= 2;
> + *tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(((u64)*iph) + ip_len);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
>
This code seems to be duplicating a lot (but not all) of the TCP/IP
input path validation checks. This is a security problem if nothing else...
Also, how do you prevent DoS attacks from hostile TCP senders that send
huge number of back to back frames?
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists