netdev - Re: [NET] gso: Fix GSO feature mask in sk_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070531.221622.62660702.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 22:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NET] gso: Fix GSO feature mask in sk_setup_caps

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:13:49 +1000

> [NET] gso: Fix GSO feature mask in sk_setup_caps
> 
> This isn't a bug just yet as only TCP uses sk_setup_caps for GSO.
> However, if and when UDP or something else starts using it this is
> likely to cause a problem if we forget to add software emulation
> for it at the same time.
> 
> The problem is that right now we translate GSO emulation to the
> bitmask NETIF_F_GSO_MASK, which includes every protocol, even
> ones that we cannot emulate.
> 
> This patch makes it provide only the ones that we can emulate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

Good catch, applied, thanks Herbert.

I don't think it's worth bothering -stable with this one,
agreed?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html