netdev - Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0706041544230.13341@d.namei>
Date:	Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Eric Paris wrote:

> Some time ago this thread bounced back and forth and seemed to come to
> rest with the patch below, I cleaned up the comments and put all the
> ACKs it received in one place below, but so much time has passed I doubt
> if they should still count for free.  I also rediffed the patch against
> the latest miller tree.  Is the idea or patch in any way flawed or
> unacceptable to people at the moment?
> 
> Anyone willing to step up an re-ack the patch to get it moving into the
> tree?

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html