[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:33:57 -0500
From: wendy xiong <wendyx@...ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@...xen.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
amitkale@...xen.com, netxenproj@...syssoft.com, rob@...xen.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] NetXen: Add NETXEN prefix to macros
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 14:05 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:52:44PM -0500, wendy xiong wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:50 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Mithlesh Thukral wrote:
> > > > NetXen: Add NETXEN prefix to a macro
> > > > This patch will add the "NETXEN" prefix to "USER_START" macro.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off by: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>
> > > > Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@...xen.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h | 4 ++--
> > > > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_hw.c | 4 ++--
> > > > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Your patch description is useless. Clearly we know -what- it does,
> > > simply by reading the patch.
> > >
> > > But it does not answer the simple question: why? why is this needed in
> > > a bug fix Release Candidate series?
> >
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > When we backported netxen driver to 2.6.9 kernel on ppc, we saw the
> > compile errors for "USER_START". Because there is another definition for
> > USER_START which is used by arch/ppc64/mm/hash_utils.c and native.c.
> >
> > So we like to add NETXEN before USER_START in netxen device driver, then
> > netxen driver can be compiled correctly in 2.6.9 kernel.
> >
> > Let me know if you any question for this patch.
>
> That answers my questions, but doesn't address the issue: You need
> to regenerate the patch with the description improved as described.
>
> The patch description is copied verbatim into the kernel changelog, and
> preserved verbatim for all eternity. Four years from now, we need to be
> able to read the patch description and understand -why- the NETXEN_xxx
> prefix was added. Simply stating that the NETXEN_xxx prefix was added
> is useless, as it is self-evident from reading the patch itself.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
Jeff,
Thanks.
We will re-generate the patch with correct issue title and description.
Thanks,
wendy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists