netdev - Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070607.020733.123970478.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dev@...ru
Cc:	xemul@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, dev@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel

From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:14:29 +0400

> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
> > Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:11:38 +0400
> > 
> > 
> >>Veth stands for Virtual ETHernet. It is a simple tunnel driver
> >>that works at the link layer and looks like a pair of ethernet
> >>devices interconnected with each other.
> > 
> > 
> > I would suggest choosing a different name.
> > 
> > 'veth' is also the name of the virtualized ethernet device
> > found on IBM machines, driven by driver/net/ibmveth.[ch]
> 
> AFAICS, ibmveth.c registers ethX devices, while this driver registers
> vethX by default, so there is no much conflict IMHO.

If that's the case, veth is fine with me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html