[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4667D02E.2090404@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:30:22 +0200
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dev@...ru, containers@...ts.osdl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvz.org, kaber@...sh.net, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel
David Miller wrote:
> From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:14:29 +0400
>
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:11:38 +0400
>>>
>>>
>>>> Veth stands for Virtual ETHernet. It is a simple tunnel driver
>>>> that works at the link layer and looks like a pair of ethernet
>>>> devices interconnected with each other.
>>>
>>> I would suggest choosing a different name.
>>>
>>> 'veth' is also the name of the virtualized ethernet device
>>> found on IBM machines, driven by driver/net/ibmveth.[ch]
>> AFAICS, ibmveth.c registers ethX devices, while this driver registers
>> vethX by default, so there is no much conflict IMHO.
>
> If that's the case, veth is fine with me.
I like Daniel's proposals with the tunnel or pipe thing in the name.
I think it is more explicit about what the device really is.
I'm currently using etun, Eric Biederman's implementation. It will be
nice to have this kind of device merged.
-- Benjamin
--
B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D
http://www.bull.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists