lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1181216629.4064.22.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:43:49 -0400 From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com> Cc: Gagan Arneja <gaagaan@...il.com>, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se> Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching On Thu, 2007-07-06 at 11:46 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > My somewhat confusing netperf script (to run on client) is attached below. > Server just requires > to run netserver. Client is not completely accurate since I am not using > netperf4 (moving to > that after some initial hiccups). Thanks KK. Folks, we need help. Please run this on different hardware. Evgeniy, i thought this kind of stuff excites you, no? ;-> (wink, wink). Only the sender needs the patch but the receiver must be a more powerful machine (so that it is not the bottleneck). A very interesting test will be say 10K flows serving different packet sizes to simulate a busy server. I realized i cant really run the sort of tests KK is running because i dont have the second machine. With pktgen i have an easy way out because i can drop all the packets on the receiver and just count them (whereas netperf requires end 2 end semantics). cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists