lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:03:29 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <>
CC:	Jeff Garzik <>, David Miller <>,,,,
	Jesse Brandeburg <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 20:47 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> 1) you need (a) well-designed hardware _and_ (b) a smart driver writer
>> to avoid bottlenecking on internal driver locks.  As you can see we have
>> both (a) and (b) for tg3 ;-)  
> How about the following patch which fixes #b for e1000 ;->
> I think the e1000s challenges are related to the gazillion variations of
> boards they support and a little challenge of too many intel cooks.
> Auke, why do you need the tx ring lock?

To prevent against multiple entries bumping head & tail at the same time as well 
as overwriting the same entries in the tx ring (contention for 
next_to_watch/next_to_clean)? It may be unlikely but ripping out the tx ring 
lock might not be a good idea, perhaps after we get rid of LLTX in e1000?

to be honest: I'm open for ideas and I'll give it a try, but stuff like this 
needs to go through some nasty stress testing (multiple clients, long time) 
before I will consider it seriously, but fortunately that's something I can do.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists