lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:30:30 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <>
CC:	Jeff Garzik <>, David Miller <>,,,,
	Jesse Brandeburg <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.

jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-06 at 15:06 -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>> the contention isn't between multiple tx attempts, but between e1000_clean and 
>> tx. 
> I got you the first time but i think i am missing something:  given that
> the lock is used only on tx - how is that protecting the contention
> between tx and rx?

our rx interrupt/clean can trigger tx cleans, reaching the same code...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists