[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181303008.4063.47.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:43:28 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Gagan Arneja <gaagaan@...il.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching
KK,
On Fri, 2007-08-06 at 17:01 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> I thought it comes to 1.147Mpps, or did I calculate wrong
> (70*1024*1024/8/8) ?
I assumed 8B to mean data that is on top of TCP/UDP?
If so then in the case of UDP we have 8B UDP header, 20B IP and 14B
ethernet < 64B minimal allowed Ethernet packet; so it gets padded and
goes out as 64B.
There are, as you state above, 1.147(or is it 1.48?) such packets/sec in
1Gbps.
So (70Mbps/1000Mbps)*1.147 is the rough number i was reffering to.
> My script was doing that earlier, I trimmed all that to make it easier
> to understand. Will post the larger version later.
That will be nice because remember we can have multiple CPU packet
producers but only one CPU consumer.
> > no problem.
>
> Thanks, please let me know what you think of the patch I sent earlier.
I havent seen a patch. Can you resend it?
> I am running a larger 5 iteration run with buffer sizes :8,32,128,512,1
> K,4K,16K.
> It is going to run for around 12 hours and since I am moving house during
> the
> weekend, I will be able to look at the results only on Monday.
>
sounds good.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists