[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070608170608.GI7904@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 12:06:08 -0500
From: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 0/18] spidernet driver bug fixes
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:12:31AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:17 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > Jeff, please apply for the 2.6.23 kernel tree. The pach series
> > consists of two major bugfixes, and several bits of cleanup.
> >
> > The major bug fixes are:
> >
> > 1) a rare but fatal bug involving "RX ram full" messages,
> > which results in a driver deadlock.
> >
> > 2) misconfigured TX interrupts, causing a sever performance
> > degardation for small packets.
>
> I realise it's late, but shouldn't "major bugfixes" be going into 22 ?
Yeah, I suppose, I admit I've lost track of the process.
I'm not sure how to submit patches for this case. The "major fixes"
are patches 6/18, 13/18 14/18 and 17/18; (the rest of the patches are
cruft-fixes). Taken alone, these four will not apply cleanly.
I could prepare a new set, with just these four; asuming these are
accepted into 2.6.22, then once 22 comes out, Jeff's .23 tree won't
merge cleanly.
What's the right way to do this?
--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists