netdev - Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1181399777.4077.40.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jun 2007 10:36:17 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com,
	jeff@...zik.org, kaber@...sh.net, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.

On Sat, 2007-09-06 at 21:08 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:

> It takes the tx_lock in the xmit routine as well as in the clean-up
> routine.  However, the lock is only taken when it updates the queue
> status.
> 
> Thanks to the ring buffer structure the rest of the clean-up/xmit code
> will run concurrently just fine.

I know you are a patient man Herbert - so please explain slowly (if that
doesnt make sense on email, then bear with me as usual) ;->

- it seems the cleverness is that some parts of the ring description are
written to on tx but not rx (and vice-versa), correct? example the
next_to_watch/use bits. If thats a yes - there at least should have been
a big fat comment on the code so nobody changes it;
- and even if thats the case, 
a) then the tx_lock sounds unneeded, correct? (given the RUNNING
atomicity).
b) do you even need the adapter lock? ;-> given the nature of the NAPI
poll only one CPU can prune the descriptors.

I have tested with just getting rid of tx_lock and it worked fine. I
havent tried removing the adapter lock.

cheers,
jamal



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html