[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706111207.23445.mithlesh@netxen.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:07:23 +0530
From: Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@...xen.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, amitkale@...xen.com,
netxenproj@...syssoft.com, rob@...xen.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] NetXen: Fix link status messages
On Sunday 10 June 2007 03:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mithlesh Thukral wrote:
> > - if ((netif_running(netdev)) && !netif_carrier_ok(netdev)) {
> > - printk(KERN_INFO "%s port %d, %s carrier is now ok\n",
> > - netxen_nic_driver_name, adapter->portnum, netdev->name);
> > + if ((netdev->flags & IFF_UP) && !netif_carrier_ok(netdev) &&
> > + netxen_nic_link_ok(adapter) ) {
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "%s %s (port %d), Link is up\n",
> > + netxen_nic_driver_name, netdev->name, adapter->portnum);
> > netif_carrier_on(netdev);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (netif_queue_stopped(netdev))
> > netif_wake_queue(netdev);
> > + } else if(!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP) && netif_carrier_ok(netdev)) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s %s Link is Down\n",
> > + netxen_nic_driver_name, netdev->name);
> > + netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> > + netif_stop_queue(netdev);
>
> Most of the patch is OK, but by substituting IFF_UP tests for
> netif_running(), you are removing race-free, correct tests and replacing
> them with incorrect, racy tests.
>
> NAK the IFF_UP changes. the rest looks OK.
I will rework the IFF_UP tests using netif_running(), test and resubmit the
patches again.
Thanks,
Mithlesh Thukral
>
> Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists