[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466D86B2.8070504@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:30:26 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, davem@...emloft.net,
arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] NET: Implement a standard ndev_printk family
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:42:31 -0700
> "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +#define ndev_printk(kern_level, netif_level, netdev, format, arg...) \
>>>> + do { if ((netdev)->msg_enable & NETIF_MSG_##netif_level) { \
>>>> + printk(kern_level "%s: " format, \
>>>> + (netdev)->name, ## arg); } } while (0)
>
> My preference would be something more like dev_printk or even use that?
> You want to show both device name, and physical attachment in the message.
yes, agreed, but currently netdev->dev->bus_id is bluntly overwritten by
net-sysfs.c making this not trivial:
+471: strlcpy(dev->bus_id, net->name, BUS_ID_SIZE);
so now netdev->dev->bus_id contains eth%d as well. I vaguely remember that there
is another way to get the bus_id back, so I can likely work around it, but this
particular overwriting of information is a BUG imo, and should be fixed.
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists