[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181586492.9836.12.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:28:12 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, davem@...emloft.net, arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] NET: Implement a standard ndev_printk family
I like the ndev_printk idea.
I think a ndev_<level> printks should take a const netdev*
as the first argument.
Also, better for the non-debug use of ndev_dbg is to have a
static inline function so printf args are verified.
For instance, dev_dbg does:
static inline int __attribute__ ((format (printf, 2, 3)))
dev_dbg(struct device * dev, const char * fmt, ...)
{
return 0;
}
Perhaps ndev_dbg should look like this:
static inline int __attribute ((format (printf, 3, 4)))
__ndev_dbg(const struct net_device *netdev, u32 level, const char *format, ...)
{
return 0;
}
#define ndev_dbg(netdev, level, fmt, args...) \
__ndev_dbg(netdev, NETIF_MSG_##level, fmt, ##args)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists