[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC3290306A83B@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:22:30 -0700
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc: <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>, "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
<Leonid.Grossman@...erion.com>, <kaber@...sh.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.
> From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:33:22 -0400
>
> > So in such a case (assuming 8 rings), One model is creating
> 4 netdev
> > devices each based on single tx/rx ring and register set and then
> > having a mother netdev (what you call the bond) that feeds these
> > children netdev based on some qos parametrization is very sensible.
>
> Why all of this layering and overhead for something so BLOODY
> SIMPLE?!?!?
>
I am currently packing up the newest patches against 2.6.23, with
feedback from Patrick. The delay in posting them was a weird panic with
the loopback device, which I just found. Let me run a test cycle or
two, and I'll send them today for review, including an e1000 patch to
show how to use the API.
Cheers,
-PJ Waskiewicz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists