[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181737935.4050.87.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:32:15 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support.
On Wed, 2007-13-06 at 13:56 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> The key argument for Jamal's solution is the NIC will send out 32
> packets in the full PHL in a reasonably short time (a few microsecs per
> Jamal's calculation). But for wireless, the PHL hardware has low
> probability to seize the wireless medium when there are full of high
> priority frames in the air. That is, the chance for transmission in PHL
> and PHH is not equal. Queuing packets in software will starve high
> priority packets than putting them to PHH as early as possible.
>
The key arguement i make (from day one actually) is to leave the
majority of the work to the driver.
My view of wireless WMM etc is it is a different media behavior
(compared to wired ethernet) which means a different view of strategy
for when it opens the valve to allow in more packets. 802.11 media has
embedded signalling which is usable. Guy Cohen gave a good use case
which i responded to. Do you wanna look at that and respond?
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists