[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a901b49a0706130728q1d8f95a5h1d9a7c66a966e3c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:58:31 +0530
From: psr <pradeep.rautela@...il.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: "Shani Moideen" <shani.moideen@...ro.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [KJ PATCH] Replacing alloc_pages(gfp, 0) with alloc_page(gfp) in net/core/pktgen.c
On 6/13/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > Does this makes any difference anyway? Both are same eventually?
> > What is the rational behind this? Can you please help me
> > understanding this?
>
> since this is one of the TO DO items i added to the list of things at
> the wiki:
>
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Memory_allocation_cleanup
>
> i'll just toss in my $0.02. if a short (more convenient) form of a
> routine has been defined, it should be used. if you have no plans to
> use it, it shouldn't have been defined in the first place.
Oh... agreed
Thanks
--pradeep
>
> in short, make a consistent decision and go with it.
>
> rday
> --
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day
> Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
> Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
> ========================================================================
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists