[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070614020055.GL15426@holomorphy.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:00:55 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Mark Fortescue <mark@...hpc.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>,
Chad Tindel <ctindel@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
discuss@...-64.org, Ioan Ionita <opslynx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v3
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> The random seg faults on x86_64 is interesting as I have been getting
> random illegal instruction faults on sparc (sun4c) with 2.6.22-rc3. I have
> not yet tried to track it down. All I know at present is that it is not a
> problem on 2.6.20.9.
Very interesting. Any hints as to how to test or how long to wait
before the illegal instructions happen?
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists