[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4676CBFD.1040901@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:16:29 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pekkas@...core.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing.
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
> @@ -465,6 +440,8 @@ looped_back:
> break;
> #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
> case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_2:
> + if (accept_source_route < 0)
> + goto unknown_rh;
> /* Silently discard invalid RTH type 2 */
> if (hdr->hdrlen != 2 || hdr->segments_left != 1) {
> IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst),
Do we really want to do this. The IPv6 working group is bending over backwards
in it's attempt to _not_ break MIPv6 while deprecating RH0. The ability to "break"
MIPv6 by disable RH2 without disabling the rest of MIP seems a "bad thing" to me.
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists