[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182270285.4968.68.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:24:45 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Gagan Arneja <gaagaan@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>
Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching
On Tue, 2007-19-06 at 17:21 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> I've ran several simple tests with desktop e1000 adapter I managed to
> find.
Mucho gracias Evgeniy.
> Test machine is amd athlon64 3500+ with 1gb of ram.
> Another point is dektop core duo 3.4 ghz with 2 gb of ram and sky2
> driver.
>
> Simple test included test -> desktop and vice versa traffic with 128 and
> 4096 block size in netperf-2.4.3 setup.
>
Sounds good enough for starters.
> Test machine runs 2.6.22-rc5-batch and mainline tree (there is a test
> with 2.6.22-rc4 and there is a noticeble performance win compared to
> that tree in the latest git, likely tcp congestion changes resulted in
> better utilisation).
Do you have tso on/off? I suspect youd see better numbers with tso off.
> Batched xmit has better numbers.
Much appreciated. It would be useful to sort of measure CPU utilization
as well (my understanding is netperf4 is more capable of that).
I think the benefit would be a lot more visible as the number of flows
goes up (simply because there will be a lot more packets/sec going into
the driver).
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists