lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
To:	Jan Engelhardt <>
cc:	Kyle Moffett <>,,
	LKML Kernel <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
Subject: Re: Scaling Max IP address limitation

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Do you really need that many IP addresses?  When somebody finally gets
>> around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then you could
>> just redirect them all to the same port on the local system.
> The way I see it, it's: "if someone gets around to implement *IPv6 NAT*"
> (which, if its designers were asked, is contrary to the idea of ipv6).

true, but back in the real world it's sometimes desriable to hid _chich_ 
specific machine somethign comes from. so I expect that implementation of 
NAT is going tohappen at some point before it's widely deployed.

David Lang
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists