| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:51:39 +0530 From: Varun Chandramohan <varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sri@...ibm.com, dlstevens@...ibm.com, varuncha@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Age Entry For IPv4 Route Table YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article <20070625102838.9d1fee20.varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun Chandramohan <varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> says: > > >> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10. >> Many snmp application require this age entry. So iam adding the age field in the routing table and providing >> the interface for this value via /proc/net/route. >> > > I'm not in favor of adding new field(s) to /proc/net/route. > > Do you think it will break any user level functionality? I have tested with netstat, route and net-snmp which reads from the same /proc interface. They seem to work fine. > --yoshfuji > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists