netdev - Re: [RFC SKBUFF]: Keep track of writable header len of headerless clones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <467F82A0.3070801@trash.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:53:52 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [RFC SKBUFF]: Keep track of writable header len of headerless
 clones

David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:53:36 +0200
>
>   
>> - sendmsg eth0, no NAT:		sys     0m2.508s
>> - sendmsg eth0, NAT:		sys     0m2.539s
>> - sendmsg eth0, NAT + patch:	sys     0m2.445s	(no change)
>>     
>
> This is probably because we're touching all the data anyways
> and if the resident set size is small enough (as a gigabit
> or 100MB ethernet TCP stream window would be) then it all fits
> mostly in the L2 caches of the cpu.

Yeah, thats what I suspected too. On loopback it seems to exceed
the cache size, which is a bit strange since its 1MB. Or maybe
there is some loopback optimization interfering.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html