| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:26:02 -0500 From: David Jones <djones@...sove.com> To: Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@...il.com> CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Scaling Max IP address limitation Ok I have tried it on a Pentium-M ( 32 Bit ,) with 512 MB RAM and Core 2 Duo with 1Gig RAM ( running SMP kernel , 2 CPUS) with same results. Cant go more than ~4K addresses. I have tried them with vanilla and custom kernels all 2.6.19+ versions. Results are same on both systems , so thats the reason I am thinking that there is some limit in kernel source tree which I cant seem to find . Really appreciate your help in this regard. Thanks, -d Robert Iakobashvili wrote: > On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> wrote: >> >> On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote: >> >> > I am getting after initial successes some errors: >> >> > "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory" >> >> > and >> >> > #ip addr | wc-l is 8194. >> >> >> >> I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192 on x86_64... >> > >> > Missed to mention: the CPU is Pentium-4. >> >> That's like saying you've got a SPARC. Or a MIPS. Or a PPC. >> (I can't infer from your answer whether that is running 32 or 64-bit >> kernel, because there are P4s with and without 64-bit extensions.) > > 32/32 > >> Jan >> -- >> > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists