netdev - Re: [PATCH] atl1: disable 64bit DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46803557.50805@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:36:23 -0400
From:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To:	Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
CC:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>,
	"Jay L. T. Cornwall" <jay@...na.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atl1: disable 64bit DMA

Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 07:42:44AM -0500, Jay Cliburn ha scritto: 
>> Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote:
>>> Jay Cliburn wrote:
>>>
>>>> For reasons not yet clear to me, it appears the L1 driver has a bug or
>>>> the device itself has trouble with DMA in high memory.  This patch,
>>>> drafted by Luca Tettamanti, is being explored as a workaround.  I'd be
>>>> interested to know if it fixes your problem.
>>> Yes, it certainly seems to. Now running with this patch and 4GB active,
>>> I've transferred about 15GB with no problem so far. It usually oopses
>>> after a GB or two.
>>>
>>> I guess it's not an ideal solution, architecturally speaking, but it's a
>>> good deal better than an unstable driver. If there's any other patches
>>> you'd like me to test or traces to capture, I'm happy to help out.
>>> Otherwise I'll run with this one for now since it does the job!
>> Okay Jay, thanks.
>>
>> Luca, would you please submit your patch to Jeff Garzik and netdev?
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> a couple of users reported hard lockups when using L1 NICs on machines
> with 4GB or more of RAM. We're still waiting official confirmation from
> the vendor, but it seems that L1 has problems doing DMA to/from high
> memory (physical address above the 4GB limit). Passing 32bit DMA mask
> cures the problem.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> I think that the patch should be included in 2.6.22.
> 
>  drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c |   15 +++------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c b/drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c
> index 6862c11..a730f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c
> @@ -2097,21 +2097,16 @@ static int __devinit atl1_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	struct net_device *netdev;
>  	struct atl1_adapter *adapter;
>  	static int cards_found = 0;
> -	bool pci_using_64 = true;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_64BIT_MASK);
> +	err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_32BIT_MASK);
>  	if (err) {
> -		err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_32BIT_MASK);
> -		if (err) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no usable DMA configuration\n");
> -			goto err_dma;
> -		}
> -		pci_using_64 = false;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no usable DMA configuration\n");
> +		goto err_dma;
>  	}
>  	/* Mark all PCI regions associated with PCI device
>  	 * pdev as being reserved by owner atl1_driver_name
> @@ -2176,7 +2171,6 @@ static int __devinit atl1_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  
>  	netdev->ethtool_ops = &atl1_ethtool_ops;
>  	adapter->bd_number = cards_found;
> -	adapter->pci_using_64 = pci_using_64;
>  
>  	/* setup the private structure */
>  	err = atl1_sw_init(adapter);
> @@ -2193,9 +2187,6 @@ static int __devinit atl1_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	 */
>  	/* netdev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO; */
>  
> -	if (pci_using_64)
> -		netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
> -
>  	netdev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
>  
>  	/*
> 
> 
> Luca

What boards have we seen this on?  It's quite possible this is:

a) an iommu-related problem specific to AMD or specific to Intel
b) a BIOS problem that atl1 happens to be a victim of

I'd rather not disable this unconditionally if we can get more 
information about why it's breaking.  Doing so might just end up 
covering up the most obvious manifestation of a larger problem.

	-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html