[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46803A9E.40705@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:58:54 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, hadi@...erus.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>>> @@ -70,14 +72,28 @@ prio_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc
>>> *sch, int *qerr) #endif
>>> if (TC_H_MAJ(band))
>>> band = 0;
>>> + if (q->mq)
>>> + skb->queue_mapping =
>>> +
>>>
>> q->prio2band[band&TC_PRIO_MAX];
>>
>>> + else
>>> + skb->queue_mapping = 0;
>>>
>> Might look cleaner if you have one central point where
>> queue_mapping is set and the band is returned.
>>
>
> I've taken a stab at this. I can have one return point, but I'll still
> have multiple assignments of skb->queue_mapping due to the different
> branches for which queue to select in the qdisc. I suppose we can do a
> rewrite of prio_classify(), but to me that seems beyond the scope of the
> multiqueue patches themselves. What do you think?
>
Thats not necessary. I just though you could add one exit point:
...
out:
skb->queue_mapping = q->mq ? band : 0;
return q->queues[band];
}
But if that doesn't work don't bother ..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists