[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <468409E4.7000603@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:20:04 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, hadi@...erus.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware
support API
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>>Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>>
>>Yes, I noticed that now. Doesn't seem right though as long as
>>queueing while queue is stopped is treated as a bug by the
>>drivers.
>>
>>But I vaguely recall seeing a discussion about this, I'll check
>>the archives.
>
>
> The basic gist is before the dequeue is done, the qdisc is locked by the
> qdisc is running bit, so another CPU cannot get in there. So if the
> queue isn't stopped when a dequeue is done, that same queue should not
> be stopped when hard_start_xmit() is called. The only thing I could
> think of that could happen is some out-of-band cleanup routine in the
> driver where the tx_ring lock is held, and the skb is bounced back,
> where the driver returns NETIF_TX_BUSY, and you requeue. This is an
> extreme corner case, so the check could be removed.
Yes, but there are users that don't go through qdiscs, like netpoll,
Having them check the QDISC_RUNNING bit seems ugly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists