netdev - Re: Fwd: [PATCH] [-mm] ACPI: export ACPI events via netlink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1183118297.4089.44.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:58:17 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-acpi@...r" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, lenb@...nel.org,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] [-mm] ACPI: export ACPI events via netlink

On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 07:48 -0400, jamal wrote:

> sure - if you rush you can make it into Daves 2.6.23; then both can
> conform at the same time.

Yeah, I'll have to see whether I can make that. If not, no big deal
either.

> > Ok :) Though I'm not sure I understood the suggestion of sending just
> > one TLV, what should I send? 
> 
> I meant when user space asks the controller "please tell me details
> about family X" you will always pass an id and name. Never just one.
> So why not just send that in a struct which has a id/name (as you
> already have defined in your current patch).

I'll have to look at the struct stuff again, but yeah, something like
that can be done.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)