[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46852632.5050707@candelatech.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:33:06 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: hadi@...erus.ca, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Subject: Re: Multiqueue and virtualization WAS(Re: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED]
Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Right, but the current bridging code always uses promiscous mode
> and its nice to avoid that if possible. Looking at the code, it
> should be easy to avoid though by disabling learning (and thus
> promisous mode) and adding unicast filters for all static fdb entries.
>
I am curious about why people are so hot to do away with promisc mode.
It seems to me
that in a modern switched environment, there should only very rarely be
unicast packets received
on an interface that does not want to receive them.
Could someone give a quick example of when I am wrong and promisc mode
would allow
a NIC to receive a significant number of packets not really destined for it?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists