lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:31:02 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: hadi@...erus.ca Cc: kaber@...sh.net, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com Subject: Re: Multiqueue and virtualization WAS(Re: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue This conversation begins to go into a pointless direction already, as I feared it would. Nobody is going to configure bridges, classification, tc, and all of this other crap just for a simple virtualized guest networking device. It's a confined and well defined case that doesn't need any of that. You've got to be fucking kidding me if you think I'm going to go through the bridging code and all of that layering instead of my hash demux on transmit which is 4 or 5 lines of C code at best. Such a suggestion is beyond stupid. Maybe for the control node switch, yes, but not for the guest network devices. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists