[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070703115840.e05a0f47.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:58:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: make net and forcedeth to use kmalloc_node
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:30:36 -0700
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> wrote:
> [PATCH 2/2] net: make net and forcedeth to use kmalloc_node
Please copy netdev@...r.kernel.org on net patches.
This patch modifies a net driver as well as the networking core. These
subsytems have different maintainers who run different development trees.
Consequently I must split your patch into two and change their titles and
changelogs appropriately.
Please do this for us in future, thanks.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> index 42ba1c0..6d53b52 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> less_rx = np->last_rx.orig;
>
> while (np->put_rx.orig != less_rx) {
> - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
> + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
If we're going to do this then it would probably make sense to change
dev_alloc_skb_node() so that it takes a `struct net_device *' rather than a
bare node-id. That's a call which the net guys will need to make, which is
why we cc them on our emails.
> if (skb) {
> np->put_rx_ctx->skb = skb;
> np->put_rx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev,
> @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev)
> less_rx = np->last_rx.ex;
>
> while (np->put_rx.ex != less_rx) {
> - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
> + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz + NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
It might help to edit code in an 80-col xterm.
Please run scritps/checkpatch.pl across all your diffs. Its suggestions
are by no means compulsory, but they do provide things for you to check up
and and have a think about, thanks.
I won't apply this (these) patches because I expect API changes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists