[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070704085120.GB19515@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:51:20 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:30:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [PATCH 2/4] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 27cfe5f..005cc1c 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ nodata:
> struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev,
> unsigned int length, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - int node = dev->dev.parent ? dev_to_node(dev->dev.parent) : -1;
> + int node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
This looks wrong to me unless the device model has once again changed
silently. When I wrote this code &dev->dev was a device allocated
as part of the netdevice and the parent is the pci (or whatever) device
that has the node information.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists