[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1183558702.3812.33.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:18:22 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: multicasting netlink messages to groups > 31 from userspace
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 16:12 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Looking through the code that uses NL_NONROOT_SEND I just realised that
> > it's impossible to send multicast messages from userspace to multicast
> > groups with IDs higher than 31. That's not really good given that
> > everywhere else we handle multicast groups up to 2^32-1 :/
>
>
> Why do you want to send to a multicast group from userspace?
Why not, what's wrong with that?
Actually, I think I mentioned this earlier, I was thinking about doing
wireless configuration as a group where both the kernel and possibly a
userspace process listen on that multicast group and processes that want
to configure a device just send to that group. Then the kernel ignores
the message if a userspace process is handling the specific device
completely. For example changing the BSSID: if the kernel is doing MLME
then it changes the BSSID, but if a userspace process is doing it then
the kernel doesn't do anything since BSSID changing is a pure MLME
function, but for consistency it'd be nice if both could be done the
same way, hence a multicast group.
This was actually suggested by Herbert since it's easy to find out if
that multicast group has a listener and not so easy if a special generic
netlink socket in userspace is (still) open.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists